The Circumstances under Which a
Landlord May Enter the
Premises Rented to a Tenant Is Regulated

08/21/05
Dear
Mr.
Duman:
Under
what
conditions may a landlord enter a tenant’s rental dwelling, when the tenant is not home?
K.
F., Richmond
Dear
K. F.:
The law
regulating a residential landlord’s right to enter a tenant's leased
dwelling
is set forth primarily within California Civil Code Section 1954.
A residential
tenant is generally entitled to exclusive possession of the leased
premises for
the duration of the tenancy, and a landlord is not ordinarily permitted
to
enter into a tenant’s unit at will.
However, Civil Code Section 1954 sets forth specific
circumstances under
which landlord may enter the rental, even over the tenant’s objection
(and in
the tenant’s absence).
Subject to
certain enumerated notice requirements, this law specifically
authorizes a
landlord (including an apartment manager or other agent of the
landlord) to
legally enter into a tenant’s leased dwelling under the following
conditions:
(1) In case of emergency; (2) Where entry is required to make necessary
or
agreed upon repairs, improvements, or to provide necessary or agreed
upon
services; (3) Where entry is necessary to exhibit the premises to third
parties
for sale, re-renting, or for remodeling and repair purposes; (4)
Pursuant to
court order; and, (5) When the tenant has surrendered or abandoned the
premises.
Additionally,
recently enacted additions to this statute now expressly allows for a
landlord’s right to enter the rental unit, in order to conduct a
“walk-through”
inspection prior to a tenant’s departure.
Civil
Code
Section 1954, also, sets forth express requirements, which dictate how
the
landlord’s entry must occur. For instance, the landlord is required to
give the
tenant reasonable advance notice of the landlord’s intent to enter the
premises. This notice requirement is
applicable in almost all cases, with the exception of emergencies, when
there
has been a surrender or abandonment of the premises, or if the tenant
is
present and consents to the entry at the time.
The required
notice may be personally delivered, and, also, may be left at the
premises with
someone of “suitable age and discretion”, or “on or near or under the
usual
entry of the premises in a manner in which a reasonable person would
discover
the notice”. The required notice may also be mailed to the tenant.
Absent
evidence to the contrary, notice, which
is given 24 hours in advance of the entry, is generally, deemed to be
"reasonable", except for when the notice is mailed, in which case a 6
day advance period from the date of the mailing is be deemed to be
reasonable.
The required
notice must be made in writing under most circumstances unless the
tenant
agrees to the entry. A verbal notice may be given, where the landlord’s
purpose
in entering the leased premises is to exhibit the premises to
prospective
purchasers, as long as the landlord has already given the tenant notice
in
writing, within the previous 120 days, of the landlord’s intent sell
the
property. When entering for this
purpose, the landlord (or agent) must “leave written evidence of the
entry
inside the unit”
Except in
cases of emergencies, or when the leased premises have been surrendered
or
abandoned, the landlord’s entry must occur during normal business
hours, unless
the landlord obtains the tenant’s consent to enter at some other time.
A landlord
(or agent), who enters a rental dwelling in violation of this law, can
incur
civil liability to the tenant under theories of "trespass", “civil
harassment”, “invasion of privacy”, “negligent or intentional
infliction of
emotional distress”, or “breach of the
landlord's covenant of quiet enjoyment” (which is implied into every
residential lease agreement). Other
causes-of-action against the landlord may also accrue, depending upon
the
nature of the intrusion.
Readers with
questions regarding a landlord’s right to entered leased property, or
pertaining to other aspects of landlord-tenant law, should consult
directly
with their own attorneys, for appropriate attention to the specific
facts at
issue.
FD742 8/12/05
4\column\rt’entry.tn5
Readers may address their
questions to The Real Estate
Lawyer, Fred M. Duman, 2807 Castro Valley Boulevard, Castro Valley, California
94546. Mr. Duman will answer those of
general
interest in his column. He reserves the
right to edit the letter for brevity and clarity.
Each real estate problem
usually has its own distinct
circumstances, and frequently is more complicated than realized by a
layperson. Readers are also encouraged
to consult with their own lawyers to obtain guidance concerning their
problems
when they first arise.
Readers are cautioned that
these answers are not intended
to be the basis for any action or reliance by the reader.
You are welcome to
visit our web site at “www.dumanlaw.com”.
© 2005, Fred M. Duman All Rights Reserved. Please see our disclaimer.
Back to Newspaper Columns